Goatonapole in Crisis:
On the Obliteration of
Embodied-Spatiality
By Miles Pflanz

Goatonapole is immanence.

In immanence there is a null beyond all comprehensibility. A null made immanent by comprehensibility. From the null immanence is posited into skin and that skin is foreclosure. Into the foreclosure all that can be despatialized is immanent. It is the demarcation of an intrusion of the marked object. Through production and consumption, the skin embodied and embodying, those sites of revolting memory, desire but never innate, the worm of the scopic and its fascinations, the null is despatialized and denaturalized from immanence that must embody it.

The interior must live with its impossible organs and the null whose pleasure those organs project that are constantly frustrating intelligibility, desiring revolt, disgusting the sublime. And therein the very protein of violation and jouissance cannot be negotiated nor entirely regulated. There is only the labor of materiality enduring the grotesquerie of the voice even as it disavows its own symptom! What labor it is to resist reflexivity. Twisting braid of affects in presence and tandem with the engaged and inaugural foreclosure. Felt swelling in the hole of immanence, permeating and beseeching innards and made abject–the very labor that insures immanence.

The grotesquerie of language and representation in which "I" am is just as laughable. Incapable of execution, all that is desired is utterance. The utterance is only the meaning of utterance–twisting braid of fetish at the discursive formation of embodied-spatiality. Embodiment is consuming itself through speech because parasitic intrusions have limited materiality as such. Interior is posited as abject–its labor insuring only constant partitioning for the grief that insures immanence.

Goatonapole is immanence mapped unto bodies through a parasitic trajectory positing its being at the locus of whole and eternal. But Goatonapole's being never recognizes the disavowal of constitutive injury nor the ab-jest it embodies. The subsequent interpellation penetrates and parasitically devours and creates the interior within a body through language. Bodies are now posited into a language that never speaks itself as language and the materiality of those bodies can only be intelligible contingent to the language's limits. The body is collapsed into a monster consuming only its own utterances.

The suspect apparatus of Goatonapole despatializes and consumes bodies into its obsessive consumption, at the same moment producing them. Negotiations of crime, desire, and action cannot be reconciled in, through, and as silence anymore as it has within the limits of Goatonapole. For within its constitution it reeks and that reek is the politics of ressentiment.